A Crooked Bridge Over Calm Waters ?
The Scenic bridge, the crooked bridge, whatever.... After negotiation with Singapore to jointly built the bridge has failed, Malaysia has announced that it will proceed to built a half “crooked” bridge across the Johore Straits to replace the existing causeway. The idea of the new bridge was the brainchild of the previous prime minister of Malaysia. The decision to unilaterally build the half brige into the middle of Johore Straits without Singapore's participation is bizzare and beyond my comprehension.
The local newspapers called the proposed “crooked” bridge the “scenic bridge”, and indirectly and sarcastically insinuated Singapore by saying that if Singaporeans want the bridge to be “straight” and “less scenic” , then Singaporeans must come to the “negotiation table” and “agree” to replace the existing causeway.
As a layman, I do not know much about international politics and face saving gestures. But as a Malaysian, I personally felt that it is a bit high handed for Malaysians especially the local newspapers to ridicule and insinuate our tiny southern neighbour. Please bear in mind, our southern neighbour do provide a lot of employment opportunities for Malaysians, both in the past and PRESENT. The way we muscled ourselves to bring Singapore to negotiation table reflect a culture of arrogant and insentivity, or what the hokkiens commonly called, “boh jin zheng” and “boh kar si”.
So, why do we want the bridge to be “Scenic” ? To show the world that the Malaysian bolihism are capable forgoing more petroleum rebates to ill afford the unnecessary wastages in luxury ? We want the bridge “crooked” to reflect to the world that Singaporeans are straight ?
What puzzled me is, we already have a Causeway that works perfectly fine ! Why can't we just built additional lanes to the existing causeway ? Why do we need to built a new bridge to replace it ? It doesn't made any economic sense to me at all. One one hand, the Malaysian government has been pleading with Malaysians that we have limited resources for development budget, that we need to tighten our belt, that we need to forgo our petroleum tax rebates, that we need to spend only on necessities, etc. etc. But on the other hand, why the government see it as a priority to unilaterally bulldozed the construction of the “half baked” bridge that serves no additional economic values ? Cakap tak serupa bikin ?
Why the urgency for unilateral actions ? Are we being over eager to award the project to the local consortium to start work when the both countries can not even see eye to eye to finalize the details ? We already have the longest bridge, the most beautiful airport, the tallest tower, etc.... Are we going after another trophy of “most crooked” Bridge in the world ?

